linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/3] mm: pagecache write deadlocks zerolength fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:19:34 +0100
From:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To:	Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] mm: pagecache write deadlocks zerolength fix

On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 11:15:39AM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de> writes:
> 
> > writev with a zero-length segment is a noop, and we shouldn't return EFAULT.
> 
> AFAICS the callers of these functions never pass a zero length.

They can in the case of a zero length write. I had considered also
doing this check in the caller, but I don't think it is too harmful
to make the API a little more robust? But if you have another
preference?

Thanks,
Nick

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/