[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061130101933.GA12579@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:19:34 +0100
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] mm: pagecache write deadlocks zerolength fix
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 11:15:39AM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de> writes:
>
> > writev with a zero-length segment is a noop, and we shouldn't return EFAULT.
>
> AFAICS the callers of these functions never pass a zero length.
They can in the case of a zero length write. I had considered also
doing this check in the caller, but I don't think it is too harmful
to make the API a little more robust? But if you have another
preference?
Thanks,
Nick
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists