linux-kernel - Re: Fix for OpenSUSE kernel bug (was Re: [Opps] Invalid opcode)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 30 Nov 2006 16:21:43 +0200
From:	"S.Çağlar Onur" <caglar@...dus.org.tr>
To:	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...e.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Daniel Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>,
	Sahil Rihan <srihan@...are.com>,
	Trampus Richmond <trampus@...are.com>, betts@...are.com
Subject: Re: Fix for OpenSUSE kernel bug (was Re: [Opps] Invalid opcode)

Hi;

30 Kas 2006 Per 08:44 tarihinde, Zachary Amsden şunları yazmıştı: 
> I'm proposing this as a fix for your bug. Having tasklets scheduled
> before softirqd gets to run might be somewhat backwards, but there is
> nothing I can find wrong about it from a correctness point of view.
> Better to boot the kernel even when compiled with bug checking on, I think.
>
> This bug started becoming apparent in 2.6.18 because of some rework with
> the CPU hotplug code, but in theory, it exists at least all the way back
> to 2.6.10, which is as far as I looked backwards in time.

I cannot reproduce that opps with 2.6.18.4 + your patch any longer, so at 
least works for me :), thanks

Cheers
-- 
S.Çağlar Onur <caglar@...dus.org.tr>
http://cekirdek.pardus.org.tr/~caglar/

Linux is like living in a teepee. No Windows, no Gates and an Apache in house!

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped