| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20061130201025.21313.69191.stgit@dwillia2-linux.ch.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:10:25 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: neilb@...e.de, jeff@...zik.org, christopher.leech@...el.com,
akpm@...l.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
olof@...om.net
Subject: [PATCH 05/12] md: workqueue for raid5 operations
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Each raid5 device gets its own queue, and each stripe has its own
work_struct. The goal is to have a free running raid5d thread, i.e. reduce
the time the stripe lock is held by removing bulk memory operations, and
removing the sleeping path in generic_make_request.
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
include/linux/raid/raid5.h | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index 232f525..c2312d1 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ static void __release_stripe(raid5_conf_
}
md_wakeup_thread(conf->mddev->thread);
} else {
+ BUG_ON(sh->ops.pending);
if (test_and_clear_bit(STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE, &sh->state)) {
atomic_dec(&conf->preread_active_stripes);
if (atomic_read(&conf->preread_active_stripes) < IO_THRESHOLD)
@@ -324,6 +325,15 @@ static struct stripe_head *get_active_st
return sh;
}
+static inline void issue_raid_ops(struct stripe_head *sh)
+{
+ raid5_conf_t *conf = sh->raid_conf;
+
+ atomic_inc(&sh->count);
+ conf->workqueue_stripes++;
+ queue_work(sh->raid_conf->workqueue, &sh->ops.work);
+}
+
static int
raid5_end_read_request(struct bio * bi, unsigned int bytes_done, int error);
static int
@@ -868,6 +878,10 @@ static void raid5_run_ops(void *stripe_h
} else if (sh->ops.count < 0)
BUG();
+ /* we kick off work to the engines in batches */
+ if (--(conf->workqueue_stripes) == 0)
+ async_tx_issue_pending_all();
+
spin_unlock(&sh->lock);
set_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state);
@@ -883,6 +897,7 @@ static int grow_one_stripe(raid5_conf_t
memset(sh, 0, sizeof(*sh) + (conf->raid_disks-1)*sizeof(struct r5dev));
sh->raid_conf = conf;
spin_lock_init(&sh->lock);
+ INIT_WORK(&sh->ops.work, raid5_run_ops, sh);
if (grow_buffers(sh, conf->raid_disks)) {
shrink_buffers(sh, conf->raid_disks);
@@ -1923,7 +1938,6 @@ static int stripe_to_pdidx(sector_t stri
* schedule a write of some buffers
* return confirmation of parity correctness
*
- * Parity calculations are done inside the stripe lock
* buffers are taken off read_list or write_list, and bh_cache buffers
* get BH_Lock set before the stripe lock is released.
*
@@ -1942,9 +1956,9 @@ static void handle_stripe5(struct stripe
int failed_num=0;
struct r5dev *dev;
- PRINTK("handling stripe %llu, cnt=%d, pd_idx=%d\n",
- (unsigned long long)sh->sector, atomic_read(&sh->count),
- sh->pd_idx);
+ PRINTK("handling stripe %llu, state=%#lx cnt=%d, pd_idx=%d ops=%lx:%lx:%lx\n",
+ (unsigned long long)sh->sector, sh->state, atomic_read(&sh->count),
+ sh->pd_idx, sh->ops.pending, sh->ops.ack, sh->ops.complete);
spin_lock(&sh->lock);
clear_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state);
@@ -2409,6 +2423,10 @@ #endif
}
}
+ if (sh->ops.count && !test_and_set_bit(STRIPE_OPSQUEUE_ACTIVE, &sh->state)) {
+ issue_raid_ops(sh);
+ }
+
spin_unlock(&sh->lock);
while ((bi=return_bi)) {
@@ -3717,6 +3735,13 @@ static int run(mddev_t *mddev)
if (!conf->spare_page)
goto abort;
}
+
+ sprintf(conf->workqueue_name, "%s_raid5_ops",
+ mddev->gendisk->disk_name);
+
+ if ((conf->workqueue = create_workqueue(conf->workqueue_name)) == NULL)
+ goto abort;
+
spin_lock_init(&conf->device_lock);
init_waitqueue_head(&conf->wait_for_stripe);
init_waitqueue_head(&conf->wait_for_overlap);
@@ -3726,6 +3751,7 @@ static int run(mddev_t *mddev)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&conf->inactive_list);
atomic_set(&conf->active_stripes, 0);
atomic_set(&conf->preread_active_stripes, 0);
+ conf->workqueue_stripes = 0;
PRINTK("raid5: run(%s) called.\n", mdname(mddev));
@@ -3879,6 +3905,8 @@ abort:
safe_put_page(conf->spare_page);
kfree(conf->disks);
kfree(conf->stripe_hashtbl);
+ if (conf->workqueue)
+ destroy_workqueue(conf->workqueue);
kfree(conf);
}
mddev->private = NULL;
@@ -3899,6 +3927,7 @@ static int stop(mddev_t *mddev)
blk_sync_queue(mddev->queue); /* the unplug fn references 'conf'*/
sysfs_remove_group(&mddev->kobj, &raid5_attrs_group);
kfree(conf->disks);
+ destroy_workqueue(conf->workqueue);
kfree(conf);
mddev->private = NULL;
return 0;
diff --git a/include/linux/raid/raid5.h b/include/linux/raid/raid5.h
index a1c3f85..c77154a 100644
--- a/include/linux/raid/raid5.h
+++ b/include/linux/raid/raid5.h
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ #define _RAID5_H
#include <linux/raid/md.h>
#include <linux/raid/xor.h>
+#include <linux/workqueue.h>
/*
*
@@ -170,6 +171,7 @@ struct stripe_head {
unsigned long pending; /* pending operations (set for request->issue->complete) */
unsigned long ack; /* submitted operations (set for issue->complete */
unsigned long complete; /* completed operations flags (set for complete) */
+ struct work_struct work; /* move ops from request to issue to complete */
int target; /* STRIPE_OP_COMPUTE_BLK target */
int count; /* workqueue runs when this is non-zero */
u32 zero_sum_result;
@@ -289,11 +291,15 @@ struct raid5_private_data {
atomic_t preread_active_stripes; /* stripes with scheduled io */
atomic_t reshape_stripes; /* stripes with pending writes for reshape */
+
+ struct workqueue_struct *workqueue;
+ int workqueue_stripes; /* stripes awaiting raid5_run_ops service */
/* unfortunately we need two cache names as we temporarily have
* two caches.
*/
int active_name;
char cache_name[2][20];
+ char workqueue_name[20];
kmem_cache_t *slab_cache; /* for allocating stripes */
int seq_flush, seq_write;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists