[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061130.123853.10298783.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 12:38:53 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mingo@...e.hu
Cc: johnpol@....mipt.ru, nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, wenji@...l.gov,
akpm@...l.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/4] - Potential performance bottleneck for Linxu TCP
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 21:30:26 +0100
> disk I/O is typically not CPU bound, and i believe these TCP tests /are/
> CPU-bound. Otherwise there would be no expiry of the timeslice to begin
> with and the TCP receiver task would always be boosted to 'interactive'
> status by the scheduler and would happily chug along at 500 mbits ...
It's about the prioritization of the work.
If all disk I/O were shut off and frozen while we copy file
data into userspace, you'd see the same problem for disk I/O.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists