[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74d0deb30611292329ifc9f69bk77bd8b3a1b22cf3e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 08:29:28 +0100
From: "pHilipp Zabel" <philipp.zabel@...il.com>
To: "David Brownell" <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc: "Bill Gatliff" <bgat@...lgatliff.com>,
"Paul Mundt" <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
"Linux Kernel list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...l.org>,
"Andrew Victor" <andrew@...people.com>,
"Haavard Skinnemoen" <hskinnemoen@...el.com>,
"Kevin Hilman" <khilman@...sta.com>,
"Nicolas Pitre" <nico@....org>,
"Russell King" <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
"Tony Lindgren" <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls
On 11/30/06, pHilipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@...il.com> wrote:
> > Effectively, yes. I counted quite a few implementations in the current
> > tree which can trivially (#defines) map to that API.
Or so I thought, sorry.
regards
Philipp
View attachment "gpio-api-pxa.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (2054 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists