[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0612011357230.7120@gockel.physik3.uni-rostock.de>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 14:08:18 +0100 (CET)
From: Tim Schmielau <tim@...sik3.uni-rostock.de>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: please pull from the trivial tree
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 01:41:18PM +0100, Tim Schmielau wrote:
[...]
> > would leave a comment that is correct, but less useful (I'd expect any
> > kernel hacker to know that u64 is non-atomic on many platforms).
>
>
> If kernel hackers are expected to already know it's non-atomic we could
> remove the whole comment.
>
> The comment regarding "volatile" was bogus since "volatile" wouldn't
> help against getting garbage when reading an u64 variable.
Well, it's probably too trivial to argue about anyways - I don't mind much
in either direction.
Tim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists