[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061202140521.GJ3078@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 14:05:21 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] timers, pointers to functions and type safety
On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 01:59:30PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 17:21 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > Now, there's another question: how do we get there? Or, at least, from
> > current void (*)(unsigned long) to void (*)(void *)...
>
> I think the real solution should be
>
> void (*function)(struct timer_list *timer);
>
> and hand the timer itself to the callback. Most of the timers are
> embedded into data structures anyway and for the rest we can easily
> build one.
Ewwwwwww....
Let's not. It means more cruft in callbacks for no good reason.
And more cruft in code setting it up, while we are at it.
> > "A fscking huge patch flipping everything at once" is obviously not an
> > answer; too much PITA merging and impossible to review.
>
> There are ~ 500 files affected and this is in the range of cleanups we
> did recently at the end of the merge window already. I'd volunteer to
> hack this up and keep the patch up to date until the final merge. I have
> done that before and I'm not scared about it. The patches are a couple
> of lines per file and I do not agree that this is impossible to review.
I'd rather see that as patch series, TYVM. And no, it won't be a couple
of lines per file with your variant.
Anyway, I'm doing that series in my tree, will post when it's over...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists