[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061202002116.GB7931@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 19:21:16 -0500
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Ben Collins <ben.collins@...ntu.com>
Cc: Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Piel <eric.piel@...mplin-utc>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Include ACPI DSDT from INITRD patch into mainline
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 03:58:14PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 19:53 +0000, Alan wrote:
> > > > The whole approach of using filp_open() not the firmware interface
> > > > is horribly ugly and does not belong mainstream.
> > >
> > > What about the point that userspace (udev, and such) is not available
> > > when DSDT loading needs to occur? Init hasn't even started at that
> > > point.
> >
> > Does that change the fact it is ugly ?
>
> No, but it does beg the question "how else can it be done"?
>
> Distros need a way for users to add a fixed DSDT without recompiling
> their own kernels.
There already is a way. It's called beating up the braindead bios authors,
and pressuring motherboard vendors to push out updates.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists