linux-kernel - why do both kobjects and ksets have a "kobj

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612031217470.4903@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Sun, 3 Dec 2006 12:25:13 -0500 (EST)
From:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
To:	Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: why do both kobjects and ksets have a "kobj_type" member?

  what is the rationale for both the kobject structs and the kset
structs having a kobj_type?  can those values possibly be different?
from kobject.h:

 ...
 *      kset - a set of kobjects of a specific type, belonging
 *      to a specific subsystem.
 *
 *      All kobjects of a kset should be embedded in an identical
 *      type.
 ...

so that suggests that the types can't be *different* within a single
kset.  furthermore, we have:

...
static inline struct kobj_type * get_ktype(struct kobject * k)
{
        if (k->kset && k->kset->ktype)
                return k->kset->ktype;
        else
                return k->ktype;
}
...

which seem to clearly show that the ktype of the kset overrides that
of the kobject, unless the kset *has* no ktype, or the kobject is not
even a member of a kset.  are either of those situations possible?
just being inordinately curious.

rday

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/