[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061203132610.471786ca.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 13:26:10 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: minyard@....org
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
OpenIPMI Developers <openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/12] IPMI: add poll delay
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 22:35:20 -0600
Corey Minyard <minyard@....org> wrote:
> Make sure to delay a little in the IPMI poll routine so we can pass in
> a timeout time and thus time things out.
>
> Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>
>
> Index: linux-2.6.19-rc6/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.19-rc6.orig/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> +++ linux-2.6.19-rc6/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
> @@ -807,7 +807,12 @@ static void poll(void *send_info)
> {
> struct smi_info *smi_info = send_info;
>
> - smi_event_handler(smi_info, 0);
> + /*
> + * Make sure there is some delay in the poll loop so we can
> + * drive time forward and timeout things.
> + */
> + udelay(10);
> + smi_event_handler(smi_info, 10);
> }
I don't understand what this patch is doing. It looks fishy. More
details, please?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists