[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1r6vgeg4k.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 16:03:55 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Peter Stuge <stuge-linuxbios@....org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, linuxbios@...uxbios.org
Subject: Re: [LinuxBIOS] #57: libusb host program for PLX NET20DC debug device
Peter Stuge <stuge-linuxbios@....org> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 04:02:03PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> >> Sure, I will send it out shortly. I currently have a working
>> >> user space libusb thing (easy, but useful for my debug)
>> >
>> > Hm - for driving which end?
>>
>> Either. The specific device we are talking about doesn't care.
>
> Which device do you have?
Well it is built by PLX, and from lsusb I see are:
0525:127a Netchip Technology, Inc.
The hardware is a little rectangular pcb board a little smaller
then a business card. Wrapped in a blue case, with vertical vents
on both of the long sides, and gets a little warm when you have been
running it for a while. The device has what appears to be 2 normal
host to slave cables running into it.
The picture at the bottom of:
http://advdbg.org/blogs/advdbg_system/articles/64.aspx
Looks like what I have. I'm curious about the whole plug both
ends into the host before plugging it into the client, and about
the strange target system BIOS requirements.
I think I succeeded in making it work without out that by just putting
in a reset. It does make the whole setup of the device a pain though.
>> > The debug port isn't really supposed to be used with anything but
>> > a debug device - which can't be enumerated normally anyway.
>>
>> It depends. If you have a debug cable with magic ends and a
>> hardcoded address of 127 the normal enumeration doesn't work. I
>> don't think anyone actually makes one of those.
>
> Only one of the ports on Stefan's PLX NET20DC that I had a look at
> during the LinuxBIOS symposium enumerated for me.
Very odd. I'm pretty certain we are talking same thing. But I do
know it has a couple of weird quirks, so maybe you just ran up against
that.
>> Debug devices are also allowed to be normal devices that just
>> support the debug descriptor. Which is what I'm working with.
>
> Aye. I would be happy if we could get something out, as you have
> done! :) Looking forward to trying it, I hope I get my device soon.
Well at least this means after it works I can probably forget about
it and let someone else maintain the code ;)
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists