linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2.6.19 2/3] sata

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1165155367.3233.220.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date:	Sun, 03 Dec 2006 15:16:07 +0100
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Cc:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19 2/3] sata_promise: new EH conversion


> But, having those flushes won't hurt either.  What was the conclusion of
> mmio <-> spinlock sync discussion?  I always feel kind of uncomfortable
> about readl() flushes.  I think they're too subtle.

those are orthogonal!
The posting flushes have nothing to do with spinlock-vs-mmio; that
discussion was about the CPU, while posting flushes are about the
chipset / bridges / etc....

> 
-- 
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/