lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 4 Dec 2006 08:43:53 -0800
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Cc:	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATCH? rcu_do_batch: fix a pure theoretical memory ordering race

On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 12:25:17AM +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On top of rcu-add-a-prefetch-in-rcu_do_batch.patch
> 
> rcu_do_batch:
> 
> 	struct rcu_head *next, *list;
> 
> 	while (list) {
> 		next = list->next;	<------ [1]
> 		list->func(list);
> 		list = next;
> 	}
> 
> We can't trust *list after list->func() call, that is why we load list->next
> beforehand. However I suspect in theory this is not enough, suppose that
> 
> 	- [1] is stalled
> 
> 	- list->func() marks *list as unused in some way
> 
> 	- another CPU re-uses this rcu_head and dirties it

The memory allocators are required to do whatever is required to
ensure that the first CPU is no longer accessing the memory before
allocating it to the second CPU.

So we should not need to do this -- and if we did, we would have
serious problems throughout the kernel.

							Thanx, Paul

> 	- [1] completes and gets a wrong result
> 
> This means we need a barrier in between. mb() looks more suitable, but I think
> rmb() should suffice.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
> 
> --- 19-rc6/kernel/rcupdate.c~rdp	2006-12-02 20:46:03.000000000 +0300
> +++ 19-rc6/kernel/rcupdate.c	2006-12-02 21:04:12.000000000 +0300
> @@ -236,6 +236,8 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_data
>  	list = rdp->donelist;
>  	while (list) {
>  		next = list->next;
> +		/* complete the load above before we call ->func() */
> +		smp_rmb();
>  		prefetch(next);
>  		list->func(list);
>  		list = next;
> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ