linux-kernel - Re: la la la la ... swappiness

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 4 Dec 2006 10:15:21 -0800 (PST)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
cc:	"Horst H. von Brand" <vonbrand@....utfsm.cl>,
	Aucoin@...ston.rr.com, "'Kyle Moffett'" <mrmacman_g4@....com>,
	"'Tim Schmielau'" <tim@...sik3.uni-rostock.de>, torvalds@...l.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dcn@....com
Subject: Re: la la la la ... swappiness

On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:

> but that's rather dumb.  Better would be to remove mlocked pages from the
> LRU.

Could we generalize the removal of sections of a zone from the LRU? I 
believe this would help various buffer allocation schemes. We have some 
issues with heavy LRU scans if large buffers are allocated on some 
nodes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/