[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612041012010.32156@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2006 10:15:21 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
cc: "Horst H. von Brand" <vonbrand@....utfsm.cl>,
Aucoin@...ston.rr.com, "'Kyle Moffett'" <mrmacman_g4@....com>,
"'Tim Schmielau'" <tim@...sik3.uni-rostock.de>, torvalds@...l.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dcn@....com
Subject: Re: la la la la ... swappiness
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> but that's rather dumb. Better would be to remove mlocked pages from the
> LRU.
Could we generalize the removal of sections of a zone from the LRU? I
believe this would help various buffer allocation schemes. We have some
issues with heavy LRU scans if large buffers are allocated on some
nodes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists