linux-kernel - Re: [Openipmi-developer] [PATCH 9/12] IPMI: add pigeonpoint poweroff

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45739DB4.6000806@oracle.com>
Date:	Sun, 03 Dec 2006 20:01:56 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Bela Lubkin <blubkin@...are.com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>,
	OpenIPMI Developers <openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Joseph Barnett <jbarnett@...orola.com>
Subject: Re: [Openipmi-developer] [PATCH 9/12] IPMI: add pigeonpoint poweroff

Bela Lubkin wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
>>> Sometime, please go through the IPMI code looking for all these
>>> statically-allocated things which are initialised to 0 or NULL and remove
>>> all those intialisations?  They're unneeded, they increase the vmlinux
>>> image size and there are quite a number of them.  Thanks.
> 
> Randy Dunlop replied:
> 
>> I was just about to send that patch.  Here it is,
>> on top of the series-of-12.
> ...
>> -static int bt_debug = BT_DEBUG_OFF;
>> +static int bt_debug;
> 
> Is it wise to significantly degrade code readability to work around a minor
> compiler / linker bug?

Is that the only one that is a problem?

I don't think it's a problem.  We *know* that static data areas
are init to 0.  Everything depends on that.  If that didn't work
it would all break.

I could say that it's a nice coincidence that BT_DEBUG_OFF == 0,
but I think that it's more than coincidence.

-- 
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/