linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] 2.6.18-rt7: fix more issues with 32-bit cycles_t in latency

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 4 Dec 2006 22:58:40 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dwalker@...sta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.18-rt7: fix more issues with 32-bit cycles_t in	latency_trace.c (take 3)


* Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:

> While I'm not against this patch, but on m68k I prefer a 32bit cycle 
> type (however it's called), so it doesn't solve the original problem.

i havent changed the cycles_t type - it's still 32-bit. I agree with you 
that we dont want to bloat 32-bit arch-level code by artificially 
forcing everyone to a 64-bit cycles_t.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/