lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 4 Dec 2006 03:47:49 -0700
From:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Allow 32-bit and 64-bit hashes

The sym2 driver would like to hash a u32 value, and it could just
call hash_long() and rely on integer promotion on 64-bit machines, but
that seems a little wasteful.
    
Following Arjan's suggestion, I split the existing hash_long into
hash_u32 and hash_u64, and made hash_long an alias to the appropriate
function.
    
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>

diff --git a/include/linux/hash.h b/include/linux/hash.h
index acf17bb..0e6e5a9 100644
--- a/include/linux/hash.h
+++ b/include/linux/hash.h
@@ -13,23 +13,36 @@
  * them can use shifts and additions instead of multiplications for
  * machines where multiplications are slow.
  */
-#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
 /* 2^31 + 2^29 - 2^25 + 2^22 - 2^19 - 2^16 + 1 */
-#define GOLDEN_RATIO_PRIME 0x9e370001UL
-#elif BITS_PER_LONG == 64
+#define GOLDEN_RATIO_PRIME_32 0x9e370001UL
 /*  2^63 + 2^61 - 2^57 + 2^54 - 2^51 - 2^18 + 1 */
-#define GOLDEN_RATIO_PRIME 0x9e37fffffffc0001UL
+#define GOLDEN_RATIO_PRIME_64 0x9e37fffffffc0001ULL
+
+#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
+#define GOLDEN_RATIO_PRIME GOLDEN_RATIO_PRIME_32
+#define hash_long(val, bits) hash_u32(val, bits)
+#elif BITS_PER_LONG == 64
+#define GOLDEN_RATIO_PRIME GOLDEN_RATIO_PRIME_64
+#define hash_long(val, bits) hash_u64(val, bits)
 #else
 #error Define GOLDEN_RATIO_PRIME for your wordsize.
 #endif
 
-static inline unsigned long hash_long(unsigned long val, unsigned int bits)
+static inline unsigned long hash_u32(u32 val, unsigned int bits)
+{
+	/* On some cpus multiply is faster, on others gcc will do shifts */
+	unsigned int hash = val * GOLDEN_RATIO_PRIME_32;
+
+	/* High bits are more random, so use them. */
+	return hash >> (32 - bits);
+}
+
+static inline unsigned long hash_u64(u64 val, unsigned int bits)
 {
-	unsigned long hash = val;
+	u64 hash = val;
 
-#if BITS_PER_LONG == 64
 	/*  Sigh, gcc can't optimise this alone like it does for 32 bits. */
-	unsigned long n = hash;
+	u64 n = hash;
 	n <<= 18;
 	hash -= n;
 	n <<= 33;
@@ -42,13 +55,9 @@ static inline unsigned long hash_long(un
 	hash += n;
 	n <<= 2;
 	hash += n;
-#else
-	/* On some cpus multiply is faster, on others gcc will do shifts */
-	hash *= GOLDEN_RATIO_PRIME;
-#endif
 
 	/* High bits are more random, so use them. */
-	return hash >> (BITS_PER_LONG - bits);
+	return hash >> (64 - bits);
 }
 	
 static inline unsigned long hash_ptr(void *ptr, unsigned int bits)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists