[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1165229693.3752.629.camel@quoit.chygwyn.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 10:54:53 +0000
From: Steven Whitehouse <steve@...gwyn.com>
To: Valerie Henson <val_henson@...ux.intel.com>,
Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com
Subject: Re: What's in ocfs2.git
Hi,
On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 12:31 -0800, Mark Fasheh wrote:
> This e-mail describes the OCFS2 patches which I intend to push
> upstream to Linus for 2.6.20.
>
> * Atime updates - thanks to Tiger Yang <tiger.yang@...cle.com>, ocfs2 now
> writes to the inode atime field. This doesn't require any disk changes,
> and is completely backwards compatible with older ocfs2 versions. An
> inodes Atime is only updated if it hasn't changed within a certain
> quantum. The user can define their own value at mount time, with 0
> indicating that atime should always be updated. This is very similar to
> the scheme implemented by gfs2. In the future, I'd like to see a "relative
> atime" mode, which functions in the manner described by Valerie Henson at:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/8/25/380
>
I'd like to second that. [adding Val Henson to the "to"] What (if
anything) remains to be done before the relative atime patch is ready to
go upstream? I'm happy to help out here if required,
Steve.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists