[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4575A170.2030805@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 11:42:24 -0500
From: Kristian Høgsberg <krh@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: benh@...nel.crashing.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] New firewire stack
David Miller wrote:
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 16:42:42 +1100
>
>> - It's horribly broken in at least two area :
>>
>> DO NOT USE BITFIELDS FOR DATA ON THE WIRE !!!
>>
>> and
>>
>> Where do you handle endianness ? (no need to shout for
>> that one).
>>
>> (Or in general, do not use bitfields period ....)
>
> Yes, this is a show stopper, the endianness and
> word-size/endian testing should have been done before
> submission.
I guess my mistake here was to present it as a patch submission. I
acknowledged in my cover letter that it wasn't feature complete and I'm not
pushing for inclusion just yet. I'm very much aware of the point that when
replacing a subsystem like this, the new code has to be as good as the old
code. In that respect, the patches I posted are lacking in other areas
(isochronous streaming is the big one) that will take more work to fix than
just making it work on big-endian and 64-bit architectures. It's still a work
in progress.
Having said that, I've been working on this for a while now, and I wanted to
announce the effort and open the discussion about replacing the old stack.
Something about "release early, release often"... :) Anyway, I've moved the
portability issues to the top of my list now.
Kristian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists