| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <5d96567b0612051114m21266529v779e34ffc492fc5e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 21:14:56 +0200 From: "Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)" <raziebe@...il.com> To: "Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@...radead.org> Cc: "Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: irq/0/smp_affinity =3 doesn't seem to work On 12/5/06, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 18:30 +0200, Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro) wrote: > > hello. > > > > I have a dual cpu AMD machine, I noticed that > > only one timer0 is working in /proc/interrutps. > > setting proc/irq/0/smp_affinity to 3 does make > > any difference. > > if you set it to 3 then the chipset gets to decide where the irq goes. > Many decide to send it to the first cpu. > > (not that it matters, the timer is so low frequency that it can go > anywhere without problems) > > -- > if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com > Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org > > thanks Arjan. Yet something is not clear to me. To the best of my knowledge , each cpu run its own schedule routine. So, if only cpu0 gets timer0 interrupts, how does cpu1 gets to run the schedule function ? what interrupts cpu1' current task ? raz - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists