[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061205112541.2a4b7414.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 11:25:41 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add __GFP_MOVABLE for callers to flag allocations that
may be migrated
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 08:00:39 -0800 (PST)
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > > > What happens when we need to run reclaim against just a section of a zone?
> > > > Lumpy-reclaim could be used here; perhaps that's Mel's approach too?
> > >
> > > Why would we run reclaim against a section of a zone?
> >
> > Strange question. Because all the pages are in use for something else.
>
> We always run reclaim against the whole zone not against parts. Why
> would we start running reclaim against a portion of a zone?
Oh for gawd's sake.
If you want to allocate a page from within the first 1/4 of a zone, and if
all those pages are in use for something else then you'll need to run
reclaim against the first 1/4 of that zone. Or fail the allocation. Or
run reclaim against the entire zone. The second two options are
self-evidently dumb.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists