[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061205114310.e85d4c7e.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 11:43:10 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yu Luming <luming.yu@...il.com>,
Miguel Ojeda Sandonis <maxextreme@...il.com>
Subject: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.20
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006 18:25:58 +0000 (GMT)
James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org> wrote:
> > > > video-sysfs-support-take-2-add-dev-argument-for-backlight_device_register.patch
> > >
> > > Does this patch update the fbdev drivers?
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.19-rc6/2.6.19-rc6-mm2/broken-out/video-sysfs-support-take-2-add-dev-argument-for-backlight_device_register.patch
> >
> > Seems not. Should it?
>
> Yes. Its bizarre.
It is.
> The drivers compile with the wrong method prototype.
No, it doesn't get compiled at all.
CONFIG_FB_ATY128_BACKLIGHT has no Kconfig record at all.
CONFIG_FB_NVIDIA_BACKLIGHT has no Kconfig record at all.
CONFIG_FB_RIVA_BACKLIGHT has no Kconfig record at all.
So this is all dead code. There is no way to enable any of it within the
config system.
> I
> updated the fbdev drivers to the new backlight_device_register and it
> compiled as expect. There are a few other problems with teh fbdev drivers.
> I will send a patch.
It's a start ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists