[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0612052139180.18570@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 21:39:57 +0100 (MET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To: Jeffrey Hundstad <jeffrey.hundstad@...u.edu>
cc: "Horst H. von Brand" <vonbrand@....utfsm.cl>,
Marty Leisner <linux@...hester.rr.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bug-cpio@....org,
martin.leisner@...ox.com
Subject: Re: ownership/permissions of cpio initrd
> It appears to not be standard with fedora for sure... but while it origiginally
> was/is a Debian package it looks like there is source if you'd like to build it
> on other systems. It was originally designed to tackle the exact problem you
> are confronting.
>
> See:
> http://freshmeat.net/projects/fakeroot/
>
> About:
> Fakeroot runs a command in an environment were it appears to have root
> privileges for file manipulation, by setting LD_PRELOAD to a library with
> alternative versions of getuid(), stat(), etc. This is useful for allowing
> users to create archives (tar, ar, .deb .rpm etc.) with files in them with root
> permissions/ownership. Without fakeroot one would have to have root privileges
> to create the constituent files of the archives with the correct permissions
> and ownership, and then pack them up, or one would have to construct the
> archives directly, without using the archiver.
Ugh that sounds even more than a hack. At least for one-user
archives, I guess nobody at Debian knows that tar has a --user and
--group option.
-`J'
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists