[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <adairgpc39m.fsf@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 15:49:09 -0800
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: Andy Fleming <afleming@...escale.com>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>,
Ben Collins <ben.collins@...ntu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Export current_is_keventd() for libphy
> But running flush_scheduled_work() from within dev_close() is a very
> sensible thing to do, and dev_close is called under rtnl_lock().
I can't argue with that -- this has actually bitten me in the past.
Hmm, I'll try to understand why we need rtnl_lock() to cover dev_close...
- R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists