[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1165297363.29784.54.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 16:42:42 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Kristian Høgsberg <krh@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] New firewire stack
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 00:22 -0500, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm announcing an alternative firewire stack that I've been working on
> the last few weeks. I'm aiming to implement feature parity with the
> current firewire stack, but not necessarily interface compatibility.
> For now, I have the low-level OHCI driver done, the mid-level
> transaction logic done, and the SBP-2 (storage) driver is basically
> done. What's missing is a streaming interface (in progress) to allow
> reception and transmission of isochronous data and a userspace
> interface for controlling devices (much like raw1394 or libusb for
> usb). I'm working out of this git repository:
A very very very quick look at the code shows that:
- It looks nice / clear
- It's horribly broken in at least two area :
DO NOT USE BITFIELDS FOR DATA ON THE WIRE !!!
and
Where do you handle endianness ? (no need to shout for
that one).
(Or in general, do not use bitfields period ....)
bitfields format is not guaranteed, and is not endian consistent.
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists