linux-kernel - Re: Relative atime (was Re: What's in ocfs2.git)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1165409301.3233.443.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date:	Wed, 06 Dec 2006 13:48:21 +0100
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Valerie Henson <val_henson@...ux.intel.com>,
	mark.fasheh@...cle.com, steve@...gwyn.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, viro@....linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Relative atime (was Re: What's in ocfs2.git)



> 
> > 	if (inode->i_sb->s_flags & MS_NOATIME)
> > 		return;
> So that that one can be deleted.


Hi,

I would mostly expect the compiler to be relatively smart about this and
group a bunch of these tests together... so I rather see readable code
than optimized code for something the compiler should be doing for us ;)

Greetings,
   Arjan van de Ven

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/