[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061206135134.GJ3927@implementation.labri.fr>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 14:51:34 +0100
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Linux should define ENOTSUP
Hi,
ENOTSUP is not used at all by linux (though it is defined for parisc),
while as susv3 specifies, ENOTSUP shall be different than EOPNOTSUPP.
Is there a reason for doing so? (except history)
Currently, code like
switch(errno) {
ENOTSUP:
foo();
break;
EOPNOTSUP:
bar();
break;
}
just can't compile...
Is there any way to fix this? Glibc people don't seem to want to fix it
on their part, see
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2363
Samuel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists