[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612060951150.3542@woody.osdl.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 09:53:41 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
Andy Fleming <afleming@...escale.com>,
Ben Collins <ben.collins@...ntu.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Export current_is_keventd() for libphy
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, David Howells wrote:
>
> + if (get_wq_data(work) == cwq
> + && test_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING, &work->management)
>
> I wonder if those can be combined, perhaps:
Gcc should do it for us, afaik. I didn't check, but gcc is generally
pretty good at combining logical operations like this, because it's very
common.
> Otherwise for i386 the compiler can't combine them because test_bit() is done
> with inline asm.
Nope. Look again.
test_bit() with a constant number is done very much in C, and very much on
purpose. _Exactly_ to allow the compiler to combine these kinds of things.
> And:
>
> + if (!test_bit(WORK_STRUCT_PENDING, &work->management))
>
> Should possibly be:
>
> + if (!work_pending(work))
Yeah, that's a worthy cleanup.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists