linux-kernel - Re: Why SCSI module needed for PCI-IDE ATA only disks ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 05 Dec 2006 20:14:25 -0600
From:	Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
To:	Ed Sweetman <safemode2@...cast.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Why SCSI module needed for PCI-IDE ATA only disks ?

Ed Sweetman wrote:
> What's not a legitimate configuration is libata drivers, no low level 
> scsi drivers, no ide drivers and no sd,sr,sg drivers.  Yet, that is the 
> configuration the kernel currently gives you. How is that more correct 
> than any of the 3 solutions I have suggested?

You can't build libata without low-level SCSI drivers. CONFIG_ATA 
automatically selects CONFIG_SCSI.

-- 
Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@...pamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/