linux-kernel - Re: PMTMR running too fast

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1165434373.28197.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 06 Dec 2006 19:46:13 +0000
From:	Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>
To:	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: PMTMR running too fast

On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 11:34 -0800, john stultz wrote:
> 
> > Should tsc be preferred to pit though?
> 
> Depends on your system. If C2/C3 or cpufreq state changes are
> detected, we mark the tsc as unstable.  

Turns out I was seeing C2 states. I'll stick with PIT for now.

Thanks,
Ian.

-- 
Ian Campbell

If ignorance is bliss, why aren't there more happy people?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)