[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200612062224.33482.ak@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 22:24:33 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc: yinghai.lu@....com, stuge-linuxbios@....org, stepan@...esystems.de,
linuxbios@...uxbios.org, linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...e.de, ebiederm@...ssion.com
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [RFC][PATCH 0/2] x86_64 Early usb debug port support.
\
> - Host, to which that console connects (through the debug device);
> runs usb_debug, much like any other usb-serial device
My understanding was that the client could run in user
space only on top of libusb.
>
> It's analagous to debugging an embedded box using a serial console
> with a Linux host ... except the target here is a PC, not an ARM
> (or PPC, MIPS, etc) custom board.
>
>
> Once the coexistence issues between the debug port and normal EHCI
> driver get worked, there's no reason not to keep using that debug
> port as a system console.
One reason is the one I covered in my last mail -- locking of the PCI
type 1 ports.
However I suppose it would be ok to switch Eric's code between early
pci access and locked one once the PCI subsystem is up and running.
Just don't forget bust_spinlocks()
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists