[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061206034642.GH3092@quickstop.soohrt.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 04:46:42 +0100
From: Horst Schirmeier <horst@...irmeier.com>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, jpdenheijer@...il.com,
Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org>, sam@...nborg.org, miraze@....de,
zzam@...too.org
Subject: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.20
Hi,
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006, Roman Zippel wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > kbuild-dont-put-temp-files-in-the-source-tree.patch
> > actually-delete-the-as-instr-ld-option-tmp-file.patch
>
> Andi had objections about the mktemp usage and I agree with him.
> The proposed patch in bugzilla didn't have this and no further
> justification was given for why it's needed.
> Below is a replacement patch with some improvements:
> - kbuild doesn't use $(AS), so use $(CC)
> - tmp dir needs only to be calculated once
> - reformat a bit to keep it under 80 columns and to be more readable
>
> bye, Roman
>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
This patch looks good to me, and I'd prefer it over the (twice
corrected) one currently in -mm.
- It's close to what Daniel Drake proposed recently [1] (main
difference: corrects the very same problem for ld-option, which might
otherwise bite us later) and what's already in Gentoo's patchkernel,
- it abstains from using mktemp, hopefully making Andi happy ;),
- resolves the current Gentoo sandbox issues without touching more
kbuild code than necessary.
Kind regards,
Horst
[1]Message-Id: <20061202194544.D9F057B40A0@....reactivated.net>
--
PGP-Key 0xD40E0E7A
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists