[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061206002226.GK24038@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 00:22:26 +0000
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To: "Michael K. Edwards" <medwards.linux@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
linux-arm-toolchain@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk, crossgcc@...rceware.org
Subject: Re: More ARM binutils fuckage
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 03:29:22PM -0800, Michael K. Edwards wrote:
> On 12/5/06, Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >There's not much to say about this, other than scream and go hide in the
> >corner. ARM toolchains are just basically fscked.
>
> And while we're on the topic of ARM linux toolchain fsckage, it would
> be nice to know what patches and incantations are currently
> recommended when configuring gcc for building various modern ARM
> kernel/ABI configurations (OABI + soft VFP, EABI, etc.).
There is no such thing as soft VFP.
I can only talk from the requirements of the kernel. gcc 3.4.3 is
the minimum for ARM, which with binutils 2.17 will allow you to build
the kernel as OABI in *any* configuration. No patches required for
either.
Enabling EABI needs a compiler which supports EABI. That's where I
get fuzzy but recent gcc 4 should be suitable. I have had it suggested
to me that EABI support in the toolchain isn't all that stable at the
moment.
As for userspace... and NPTL, that's a different matter.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists