[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <je7ix3bycr.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 14:59:48 +0100
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux should define ENOTSUP
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> writes:
> Can you please quote chapter and verse (in POSIX) where it states that
> ENOTSUP and EOPNOTSUP have to be numerically distinct?
<http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/errno.h.html>
"Their values shall be unique except as noted below."
(And there is no exception for ENOTSUP/EOPNOTSUP yet.)
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@...e.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists