linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] PCI MMConfig: Share what's shareable.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061207170103.GB50797@dspnet.fr.eu.org>
Date:	Thu, 7 Dec 2006 18:01:04 +0100
From:	Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com>
To:	Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
	"Hack inc." <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] PCI MMConfig: Share what's shareable.

On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 06:03:17PM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 04:53:36PM +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> 
> > # git grep '//' -- '*.c' |fgrep -v 'http://' |wc -l
> > 14333
> > 
> > You lost that war ages ago.  Come join us in this millenia,
> > line-comments exist officially in C since 1999, and were supported
> > way before that.
> 
> If I was bored, I might've counted how many /* */ style comments we
> had in the source,

426K or so.

> then used it to construct an elaborate argument why C++-style
> comments are evil and Conformance is Goodness, but I'm not, so I
> won't.

I've yet to see an actual technical argument against them.  I find
them more readable by making it perfectly obvious what their
application range is, contrary to /* where you need to find the
closing */.  But that's just me.

  OG.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/