[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200612071824.33169.ak@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 18:24:33 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86_64: do not enable the NMI watchdog by default
> and it needs to be
> undone via the patch attached further below.
I disagree. And it has often saved my ass on 64bit. I
On 32bit it might be reevaluated -- i didn't expect that amount
of laptop firmware bugs triggered by it, but I'm not quite
ready to give up on that yet.
> If Andi wants to debug stuff via the NMI wachdog, he should use the
> nmi_watchdog=2 boot option:
This means for most lockups which are hard to reproduce we don't
get any backtrace.
And nmi_watchdog=2 is bad because it runs at HZ frequency
and has quite high overhead.
> also, lock debugging facilities catch lockup possibilities (and actual
> lockups) alot more efficiently,
Production kernels don't have lock debugging enabled because it
has far too much overhead.
> 8 were caught by lockdep, 8 by atomicity checks in the scheduler, 7 by
> DEBUG_PREEMPT and 1 by DEBUG_SPINLOCK.
None of which is enabled on non debug kernels.
> Note: zero were caught by the NMI watchdog, and i run the NMI watchdog
> enabled by default on all architectures, and i have serial logging of
> everything.
Sure lock debugging will probably catch most of this earlier,
but we don't have it usually.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists