[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061207095715.0cafffb9.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 09:57:15 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: torvalds@...l.org, macro@...ux-mips.org,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, rdreier@...co.com,
afleming@...escale.com, ben.collins@...ntu.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Export current_is_keventd() for libphy
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 12:05:38 -0500
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> wrote:
> Yes, I merged the code, but looking deeper at phy its clear I missed
> some things.
>
> Looking into libphy's workqueue stuff, it has the following sequence:
>
> disable interrupts
> schedule_work()
>
> ... time passes ...
> ... workqueue routine is called ...
>
> enable interrupts
> handle interrupt
>
> I really have to question if a workqueue was the best choice of
> direction for such a sequence. You don't want to put off handling an
> interrupt, with interrupts disabled, for a potentially unbounded amount
> of time.
That'll lock the box on UP, or if the timer fires on the current CPU?
> Maybe the best course of action is to mark it with CONFIG_BROKEN until
> it gets fixed.
hm, maybe. I wonder if as a short-term palliative we could remove the
current_is_keventd() call and drop rtnl_lock. Or export current_is_keventd ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists