| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <yq03b7rv35h.fsf@jaguar.mkp.net> Date: 07 Dec 2006 15:53:30 -0500 From: Jes Sorensen <jes@....com> To: "Komal Shah" <komal.shah802003@...il.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: gen_pool_destroy(...)? >>>>> "Komal" == Komal Shah <komal.shah802003@...il.com> writes: Komal> Hi, Why we don't have gen_pool_destroy(...) like Komal> mempool_destroy(...)? As of now I can only see the application Komal> of genalloc function in ia64/uncached.c file only. Well, we didn't need it so it wasn't considered. I don't see any reason why it couldn't be added. Cheers, Jes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists