linux-kernel - Re: additional oom-killer tuneable worth submitting?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4578871C.2010309@nortel.com>
Date:	Thu, 07 Dec 2006 15:26:52 -0600
From:	"Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: additional oom-killer tuneable worth submitting?

Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 12:30 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:

>>The "oom-thresh" value maps to the max expected memory consumption for 
>>that process.  As long as a process uses less memory than the specified 
>>threshold, then it is immune to the oom-killer.
> 
> You would need to specify the measure of memory used by your process;
> see the (still not resolved) RSS debate.

Currently we simply use mm->total_vm, same as the oom killer.

Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/