[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4578896C.3080504@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:36:44 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
CC: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, akpm <akpm@...l.org>,
jesper.juhl@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] CodingStyle updates
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Dec 7 2006 00:48, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> +The preferred way to ease multiple indentation levels in a switch
>> +statement is to align the "switch" and its subordinate "case" labels in
>> +the same column instead of "double-indenting" the "case" labels. E.g.:
>> +
>> + switch (suffix) {
>> + case 'G':
>> + case 'g':
>> + mem <<= 10;
>> + case 'M':
>> + case 'm':
>> + mem << 10;
> ^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Statement has no effect ;-)
Argh, thanks, fixed these.
And removed most fall-throughs to make it a better example.
>> +Use one space around (on each side of) most binary operators, such as
>> +any of these:
>> + = + - < > * / % | & ^ <= >= == !=
>
> And the ternary operator ?:
Added.
>> +but no space after unary operators:
>> + sizeof ++ -- & * + - ~ ! defined
>
> And no space before these unary operators,
> ++ (postincrement) -- (postdecrement)
>
> What keyword is "defined"? Did you have too much Perl coffee? :)
>
>> +and no space around the '.' unary operator.
>
> Same goes for ->
Added.
>> +Linux style for comments is the pre-C99 "/* ... */" style.
>
> Aka C89.
Changed.
>> +Don't use C99-style "// ..." comments.
>> +
>> +The preferred style for long (multi-line) comments is:
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * This is the preferred style for multi-line
>> + * comments in the Linux kernel source code.
>> + * Please use it consistently.
>> + */
>
> Description: Stars to the left with two almost blank (/*, */) lines.
Added.
Thanks. Will resend later today...
--
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists