linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] WorkStruct: Use direct assignment rather than cmpxchg()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20061207.141140.39644636.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 07 Dec 2006 14:11:40 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	dhowells@...hat.com
Cc:	James.Bottomley@...elEye.com, akpm@...l.org, torvalds@...l.org,
	davem@...emloft.com, wli@...omorphy.com, matthew@....cx,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] WorkStruct: Use direct assignment rather than
 cmpxchg() 

From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 21:16:03 +0000

> I don't know that sparc32 can do conditional instructions for
> example.  If we force this assumption it becomes a potential
> limitation on the archs we can support.  OTOH, it may be that every
> arch that supports SMP and has to emulate bitops with spinlocks also
> supports conditional stores; but I don't know that.

Sparc32 has normal branches but no conditional instruction execution.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/