[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612071745270.20138@iabervon.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 18:04:04 -0500 (EST)
From: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@...ervon.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Disable INTx when enabling MSI
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Greg KH wrote:
> Care to take Jeff's proposed patch, verify that it works and forward it
> on to me?
I'll test it tomorrow. Testing disables my network, and making sure the
problem exists without the patch kills my disk controller, so I need to
sit at the computer for a while. I assume that I've got the only known
device that demonstrates the need for this?
Off topic: would it be wise as a general rule to somehow shut down devices
whose interrupts get disabled by the "nobody cared!" code? Or maybe call
their interrupt handlers periodically to keep them alive?
-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists