[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26012.1165535903@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 23:58:23 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
torvalds@...l.org, davem@...emloft.com, wli@...omorphy.com,
matthew@....cx, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] WorkStruct: Use direct assignment rather than cmpxchg()
Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> Incorrect. pre-v6 ARM bitops for test_and_xxx_bit() all do:
>
> save and disable irqs
> load value
> test bit
> if not in desired state, alter bit and write it back
> restore irqs
Hmmm... ARM has two implementations. One in the header files which is what I
consulted when writing that email:
static inline void ____atomic_set_bit(unsigned int bit, volatile unsigned long *p)
{
unsigned long flags;
unsigned long mask = 1UL << (bit & 31);
p += bit >> 5;
raw_local_irq_save(flags);
*p |= mask;
raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
}
And the other in the libs which does as you say. Why the one in the header
file at all?
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists