lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 08 Dec 2006 02:33:36 -0800
From:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	davej@...emonkey.org.uk,
	"Myaskouvskey, Artiom" <artiom.myaskouvskey@...el.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>, shai.satt@...el.com,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, hpa@...or.com,
	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Subject: [PATCH] efi is_memory_available ia64 hack build fix

From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>

The addition of an is_available_memory() routine to some arch i386
code, along with an extern for it in efi.h, caused the ia64 build
to fail, which has the apparently identical routine, marked 'static'.

The ia64 build fails with:

arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c:229: error: static declaration of 'is_available_memory' follows non-static declaration
include/linux/efi.h:305: error: previous declaration of 'is_available_memory' was here              

Removing the static modifier from the ia64 definition of this
routine lets it build.

But it still doesn't seem right - as now we have two apparently
identical copies of is_available_memory() defined, in:

  arch/i386/kernel/efi.c
  arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c

However, I don't know what to do about that.
At least the build gets past this point now.

Signed-off-by: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>

---

 arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- 2.6.19-rc6-mm2.orig/arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c	2006-12-08 02:05:57.190745630 -0800
+++ 2.6.19-rc6-mm2/arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c	2006-12-08 02:07:38.256082124 -0800
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ efi_gettimeofday (struct timespec *ts)
 	ts->tv_nsec = tm.nanosecond;
 }
 
-static int
+int
 is_available_memory (efi_memory_desc_t *md)
 {
 	if (!(md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_WB))

-- 
                          I won't rest till it's the best ...
                          Programmer, Linux Scalability
                          Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.650.933.1373
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ