linux-kernel - cfq performance gap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1165536200.25180.1.camel@dyn9047017105.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 07 Dec 2006 16:03:20 -0800
From:	Avantika Mathur <mathur@...ibm.com>
To:	axboe@...e.de
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: cfq performance gap

Hi Jens, 

I've noticed a performance gap between the cfq scheduler and other io
schedulers when running the rawio benchmark. 
Results from rawio on 2.6.19, cfq and noop schedulers: 

CFQ: 

procs           device    num read   KB/sec     I/O Ops/sec 
-----  ---------------  ----------  -------  -------------- 
  16         /dev/sda       16412     8338            2084 
-----  ---------------  ----------  -------  -------------- 
  16                        16412     8338            2084 

Total run time 0.492072 seconds 


NOOP: 

procs           device    num read   KB/sec     I/O Ops/sec 
-----  ---------------  ----------  -------  -------------- 
  16         /dev/sda       16399    29224            7306 
-----  ---------------  ----------  -------  -------------- 
  16                        16399    29224            7306 

Total run time 0.140284 seconds 

The benchmark workload is 16 processes running 4k random reads. 

Is this performance gap a known issue? 
Thanks, 
Avantika Mathur 


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/