[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061208153250.GB31068@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 15:32:50 +0000
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] WorkStruct: Implement generic UP cmpxchg() where an arch doesn't support it
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 03:06:06PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 11:05:22AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd really appreciate a cmpxchg that is generically available for
> > > all arches. It will allow lockless implementation for various performance
> > > criticial portions of the kernel.
> >
> > I suspect ARM may have been the last one without one, no?
> >
> > That said, cmpxchg won't necessarily be "high-performance" unless the hw
> > supports it naturally in hardware, so..
> >
> > Russell, are you ok with the code DavidH posted (the "try 2" one)? I'd
> > like to get an ack from the ARM maintainer before applying it, but it
> > looked ok.
>
> Things seem to have moved on since this request. Do I need to do
> anything? I dunno.
ARM's still broken.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists