linux-kernel - Re: UML and fastcall/FASTCALL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 8 Dec 2006 11:33:04 -0500
From:	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc:	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: UML and fastcall/FASTCALL

On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 01:59:28PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> UML on i386 is now the only case where fastcall/FASTCALL is not a noop.

If i386 doesn't use it any more, then UML shouldn't either.  The only reason
there's support for it in UML is that I was copying i386.

				Jeff

-- 
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/