[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1165606697.400.2.camel@localhost>
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:38:17 +0100
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] HID patches for 2.6.19
Hi Linus,
> > Here are some patches that move the HID code to a new directory allowing
> > it to be used by other kernel subsystems easier.
>
> I pulled. However, I think the Kconfig changes are HORRIBLE.
>
> I don't understand why people don't use "select" more. Why should Kconfig
> ask for "Generic HID support?" That question _never_ makes sense to a
> user. And if you answer "n", you'll not get USB_HID.
>
> This is not user-friendly. If you need HID support, just select it. Don't
> ask people questions that make no sense. If the generic HID code is needed
> for some driver, you just select it. If it's not needed, you don't. It's
> that easy.
since we don't have any user-space or out of kernel HID transport
drivers at the moment it would make sense to simply select HID if
someone selects USB_HID or the upcoming Bluetooth transport.
Regards
Marcel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists