linux-kernel - Re: [discuss] Re: What was in the x86 merge for .20

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200612082115.55374.ak@suse.de>
Date:	Fri, 8 Dec 2006 21:15:55 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	discuss@...-64.org
Cc:	"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: What was in the x86 merge for .20

On Friday 08 December 2006 19:00, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 06:10:29PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Yes please check the mainline git tree.
> 
> Ok. I think I am the culprit :(
> 
> Andi, Attached patch should fix the panic issue that Andrew encountered.
> Andrew, please confirm.

Thanks.
> 
> Andi, if you are applying Ingo's genapic changes and reverting this quirk
> changes in git, then there is no need to apply the appended patch.
> 
> Personally, I would like to go with Ingo's changes as it cleans up quite 
> a bit of code.

They need more testing/review first. Maybe later.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/