[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061208122921.5c30d543.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 12:29:21 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Rocky Craig <rocky.craig@...com>
Cc: minyard@....org, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
OpenIPMI Developers <openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] IPMI: Fix BT long busy
On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 06:03:59 -0700
Rocky Craig <rocky.craig@...com> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> >In fact, please don't write macros.
> >
> >
> I see them all over the place (i.e., EXPORT_SYMBOL) so the request
> is a little confusing to me...
It's a general principle. Sometimes they're unavoidable. Other times they
are avoidable but people add them anyway.
> > Please don't write macros which require that the caller have a particular
> >
> >local variable of a particular name.
> >
> >
> I could understand that, even if some people did agree with my desire
> to increase legibility by decreasing visual clutter. I think it also
> provides
> some protection against typos in argument lists.
>
> I'm (naively) curious as to why it's being flagged now as opposed to
> two years ago when I submitted the original additions.
It probably didn't get noticed. Some of the stuff we have in there is
unbelieveable.
> Have reviewers or review methods changed?
>
> Have standards changed?
We have become more vigilant over time.
> Did it just slip under someone's radar two years ago?
I'd say so, yes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists